Skip to main content

Classic News Sources

Here’s a top 10 list of some of the most prominent news sources covering Israel and the Middle East, including their origins, funding, perceived biases, and potential reasons for those biases:

1. Haaretz

  • Country: Israel
  • Bias: Left-leaning
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 1918, Haaretz is Israel’s oldest daily newspaper. Initially aiming to represent a progressive and liberal viewpoint, it has become known for its focus on human rights, social justice, and liberal policies.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by the Schocken family and Leonid Nevzlin, a Russian-born Israeli businessman, Haaretz operates as a private company.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Haaretz’s liberal, progressive bias reflects its readership, which is typically left-leaning. Its funding structure allows it to maintain a consistent editorial line that often criticizes the Israeli government’s policies, particularly regarding the Palestinian territories.

2. The Times of Israel

  • Country: Israel
  • Bias: Moderate to center-right
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 2012 by David Horovitz, former editor of The Jerusalem Post, The Times of Israel seeks to provide a balanced perspective on Israeli news, catering to English-speaking audiences interested in in-depth analysis of Israeli and Middle Eastern affairs.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Privately owned and supported by advertisements and subscriptions.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: While it strives for a balanced tone, The Times of Israel’s focus on Western, particularly American, readers sometimes reflects more centrist or moderately pro-Israel viewpoints, aligning with mainstream Israeli narratives.

3. The Jerusalem Post

  • Country: Israel
  • Bias: Center-right
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 1932 as The Palestine Post, it was established by Gershon Agron to serve English-speaking Jewish audiences. It shifted toward a more center-right stance after being acquired by Canadian media mogul Conrad Black in 1989.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Currently owned by Media Business Information Ltd., with revenue from advertisements and subscriptions.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Reflecting a more nationalistic perspective, it aligns with a generally pro-Israel stance. Its audience includes Israeli and Jewish diaspora readers, particularly in the United States, which influences its editorial choices to favor mainstream Israeli government perspectives.

4. Yedioth Ahronoth

  •  Country: Israel
  • Bias: Center to center-right
  • Origins and Agenda: Established in 1939, Yedioth Ahronoth was intended to be a mainstream daily newspaper representing a range of views within Israeli society. Over time, it became known for supporting centrist and occasionally nationalist views.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by the Mozes family, it is one of Israel’s largest media conglomerates, sustained by advertising and subscription revenue.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Although Yedioth Ahronoth claims neutrality, it has been accused of aligning with the Israeli establishment, partly due to its financial ties to powerful Israeli families, which can temper its criticism of the Israeli government.

5. Al Jazeera

  • Country: Qatar
  • Bias: Generally critical of Israel; supports Palestinian narratives
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 1996 by the Emir of Qatar, Al Jazeera aimed to provide a platform for free speech and Arab perspectives in the region, frequently challenging Western and pro-Israel narratives.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by the Qatari government, Al Jazeera receives substantial financial support from the Qatari state.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Due to its Qatari state funding, Al Jazeera often aligns with Qatari foreign policy, which supports Palestinian causes and is critical of Israeli policies. This sponsorship shapes its bias, especially in its Arabic-language reporting.

6. Al-Arabiya

  • Country: Saudi Arabia
  • Bias: Conservative, generally supportive of Sunni-Arab perspectives, occasionally critical of Israel
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 2003 by the Saudi broadcaster Middle East Broadcasting Center (MBC), Al-Arabiya was created as an alternative to Al Jazeera, aiming to provide a moderate and conservative Arab viewpoint.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by Saudi business interests and indirectly by the Saudi government.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Al-Arabiya’s Saudi funding aligns it with Saudi Arabian foreign policy, which traditionally supported Palestinian issues. Recently, however, Saudi-Israel relations have warmed, which may affect its coverage of Israel.

7. Middle East Eye (MEE)

  • Country: UK-based
  • Bias: Left-leaning, generally critical of Israel
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 2014 by former Guardian writer David Hearst, MEE was founded to provide alternative Middle Eastern perspectives with a focus on human rights.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Independent, with allegations of Qatari financial backing, though MEE claims it’s funded by donations and partnerships.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Middle East Eye’s perceived Qatari influence has led to frequent pro-Palestinian, critical-of-Israel coverage, aligning it with similar perspectives found in Al Jazeera’s Arabic-language coverage.

8. Arab News

  • Country: Saudi Arabia
  • Bias: Conservative, Sunni-Arab aligned, with a growing moderate tone toward Israel
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 1975 as Saudi Arabia’s first English-language daily, Arab News initially represented conservative Saudi interests.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by the Saudi Research and Marketing Group, with funding indirectly tied to the Saudi government.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Historically pro-Palestinian, Arab News has softened its tone toward Israel, reflecting the recent Saudi-Israeli rapprochement. Its funding influences its conservative, Sunni-Arab perspective, with pro-Saudi government narratives prominent in its reporting.

9. Ma’an News Agency

  • Country: Palestinian Territories
  • Bias: Pro-Palestinian, critical of Israeli policies
  • Origins and Agenda: Established in 2002 to provide independent Palestinian news, Ma’an is headquartered in the West Bank and focuses on Palestinian perspectives, often highlighting human rights and social issues.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by a combination of European and American grants, along with independent donations.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: With funding from European and international donors, Ma’an News prioritizes Palestinian viewpoints and critiques of Israel. Its pro-Palestinian focus reflects both its audience and its sponsors, who often support human rights and development work in the Palestinian Territories.

10. Reuters and Associated Press (AP)

  • Country: International (UK and USA-based)
  • Bias: Attempts to remain neutral, often seen as center-left due to coverage of humanitarian issues
  • Origins and Agenda: Both agencies are long-established international news services (Reuters founded in 1851, AP in 1846), focused on delivering global news without overt bias.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded through subscriptions from global media organizations and outlets.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: While both aim for neutrality, the international audience and humanitarian focus can lead to criticism from pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups, each of whom may perceive bias in coverage that highlights human rights issues.

This list captures some of the primary news sources covering Israel and the Middle East, along with insights into their origins, biases, and funding influences that shape their perspectives. These biases reflect a complex web of historical, political, and financial factors, making it essential to consult multiple sources to gain a more balanced understanding of the region.

International Mainstream Media Sources

Here’s an overview of the top 10 major international news networks that cover Israel and the Middle East, detailing their origins, biases, funding, and the factors influencing their perspectives on regional issues:

1. CNN

  • Country: United States
  • Bias: Generally center-left
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 1980 by Ted Turner as the first 24-hour news network, CNN initially focused on impartial, rapid reporting. Over the years, it has leaned towards center-left reporting, particularly on social and humanitarian issues.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by Warner Bros. Discovery, funded primarily through advertising and cable subscriptions.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: CNN’s large, diverse American audience and corporate ownership contribute to a liberal-leaning bias, often emphasizing human rights, diplomacy, and narratives sympathetic to Palestinian issues in the Israel-Palestine context. Its international reach also shapes its content to appeal to global viewers sensitive to humanitarian concerns.

2. BBC News

  • Country: United Kingdom
  • Bias: Perceived as center-left
  • Origins and Agenda: Established in 1922, the BBC was created as a public service broadcaster. Its initial agenda was to provide impartial and comprehensive news to British and international audiences.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Primarily funded by the UK government through licensing fees, with additional international revenues.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Despite its funding structure, the BBC has editorial independence. However, its public funding and diverse international audience can lead to a liberal or center-left bias, with coverage focusing on human rights issues, which sometimes draws criticism from both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups.

3. NBC News

  • Country: United States
  • Bias: Center-left
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 1940 as a division of the National Broadcasting Company, NBC News aimed to provide reliable news for a broad American audience, with an emphasis on mainstream perspectives.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by Comcast, a large American telecommunications company, and funded through advertising and subscriptions.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: NBC News generally reflects mainstream American liberal values, which can lead to coverage that is sympathetic to human rights issues in the Middle East. It often emphasizes humanitarian concerns, leading to criticism from pro-Israel advocates who perceive its coverage as overly critical of Israel.

4. Fox News

  • Country: United States
  • Bias: Conservative, right-leaning
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 1996 by Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes, Fox News was established as a conservative alternative to other mainstream media networks.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by Fox Corporation, with revenue from advertising and subscriptions.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Fox News’ conservative stance and predominantly right-leaning American audience contribute to a pro-Israel bias, often aligning with U.S. conservative foreign policy. This is reflected in coverage that supports Israeli security policies and is often critical of Palestinian political organizations and their allies.

5. Sky News

  • Country: United Kingdom
  • Bias: Center-right
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 1989 by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, Sky News was designed as a 24-hour news channel for British and global audiences, with a reputation for straight news coverage.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Owned by Comcast (which also owns NBC News), funded by subscriptions, advertising, and international partnerships.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: While Sky News maintains an editorially independent reputation, its British audience and center-right leanings can lead to more conservative or pro-Israel coverage compared to other UK outlets. Its approach generally favors Western security perspectives, including Israeli security concerns, though it also covers humanitarian issues.

6. France 24

  • Country: France
  • Bias: Center to center-left
  • Origins and Agenda: Founded in 2006 by the French government to provide a French perspective on international news, France 24 emphasizes multilingual and multicultural reporting.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by the French government, operating as part of France Médias Monde.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Although state-funded, France 24 maintains editorial independence. Its European, secular viewpoint often leads to balanced coverage, though its center-left bias can result in a focus on humanitarian and social issues in the Israel-Palestine conflict, sometimes seen as more sympathetic to Palestinian perspectives.

7. RT (Russia Today)

  •  Country: Russia
  • Bias: Pro-Russian, anti-Western, occasionally pro-Palestinian
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 2005 as a state-funded broadcaster, RT aims to provide Russia’s perspective on global news, often countering Western narratives.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Entirely funded by the Russian government.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: RT’s pro-Russian bias and anti-Western stance lead to coverage critical of Israel, especially when aligned with U.S. interests. Its anti-Western narrative often positions it as sympathetic to Palestinian perspectives, though this is generally motivated by a desire to counter U.S. and allied foreign policies.

8. Deutsche Welle (DW)

  • Country: Germany
  • Bias: Center-left, with a focus on human rights
  • Origins and Agenda: Established in 1953 to provide international news from a German perspective, DW promotes democracy, human rights, and education worldwide.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by the German government, though it operates with editorial independence.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: DW’s European funding and values-oriented mission lead to a center-left bias, often emphasizing humanitarian issues and social justice. In the Israel-Palestine conflict, this bias sometimes results in a focus on Palestinian human rights, though it generally remains neutral.

9. Al Jazeera English

  • Country: Qatar
  • Bias: Center-left to left, often critical of Israel
  • Origins and Agenda: Al Jazeera English was launched in 2006 as an English-language counterpart to Al Jazeera Arabic, focusing on providing an alternative perspective on global news.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded by the Qatari government.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Despite editorial independence, Al Jazeera English aligns with Qatari foreign policy, which includes a pro-Palestinian stance. Its focus on human rights and advocacy journalism leads to critical coverage of Israel, especially regarding Palestinian issues, while also positioning itself as a counter-narrative to Western media.

10. Euronews

  • Country: European Union-based (Lyon, France)
  • Bias: Center to center-left
  • Origins and Agenda: Launched in 1993 as a European-centric international news channel, Euronews focuses on offering news with a distinctly European perspective.
  • Funding and Sponsorship: Funded through a mix of European Commission grants, private partnerships, and advertising revenue.
  • Impact of Sponsorship: Euronews’ center-left bias reflects its European Union connections, often promoting narratives centered on diplomacy, human rights, and international law. Its coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict leans toward highlighting humanitarian issues and Palestinian perspectives, particularly in the context of international law and human rights.

This overview covers the international networks that frequently report on Israel and the Middle East, highlighting their origins, biases, and the underlying factors that shape their perspectives. Given their wide reach and influence, these networks contribute to global perceptions of the region, and their varied biases reflect a range of geopolitical, cultural, and corporate influences.

No Comments
Back to top